War from Myceneans to Rome Essay -- essays research papers

WAR FROM MYCENEANS TO capital of ItalyThe modern day soldier did not arrive at the stream level of training methods overnight. Throughout history play offf be techniques and strategies have evolved from the earliest primitive battles to the latest technologies. The only way to learn about war is to study the past engagements and lessons learned. There are nine principles of war as follows Objective, Offensive, Mass, Economy of rend, Maneuver, Unity of command, Security, Surprise, and Simplicity. These are the areas of study in order to construct a better chthonianstanding of what to do and what to avoid during any engagement. The battles from yesterday differ from those in recent years and today, because the more primitive gardenings fought under their leader for food, territory, or the domination of an early(a) group. Todays motives are based more on economic, political, or social reasons regarded as take away by a group of individuals instead of the thoughts or intentions o f one man.Mainland Greece is the first-class honours degree study of warfare in the selected readings and by 1600 B.C. a civilization emerged from the Hellas culture and the Minoan culture. This group, known as the Myceneans, fought using chariots and armor made of bronze. By the eighth century B.C., the Myceneans art of war consisted of the phalanx. The phalanx was a unhurt rectangle of infantrymen carrying armor and spears eight deep. When an army approached another army the phalanxes of both sides would bewilder head to head. The soldiers, who were normally citizens not professional soldiers, would find themselves in the middle of blood and sweat pouring out of the bodies surrounding them from the playscript to hand combat. The only way of victory was to hold the lines strong and fight until the other side fled. The problems with this type of formation was that in that location was no overall lead within the phalanx, no reserve was established to outflank the opposing army , and there was no way to pursue the fleeing enemy, left them capable to heal and fight another day.The technique of phalanx had not changed for some time and the classical warfare stayed the same due to no major opposition force that used different techniques against Greek system. The phalanx was also used because it was a proven technique that had been tested and used successfully. O... ...diterranean, Hannibal moved to engage the Romans and some conquered them at Cannae (216 B.C.), where the largest Roman army was surrounded, enveloped, and destroyed. The Romans needed military leadership to get Hannibal and found it in Scipio.Scipio made the maniples stronger than ever and increased the amount of horsemen in the cavalry to solve the problem that the Romans had against Hannibal. By using adapting techniques to envelop and maneuver sea power, Scipio was able to defeat Carthage at the battle of Zama (202 B.C.), and thereof the Romans were ready to expand their empire from Spa in to Asia Minor and from Britain to Northern Africa.SOURCES USEDPreston, Richard A., Alex Roland, and Sydney F. Wise. workforceIn Arms A History of state of war and its interrelationshipsWith Western Society. (Belmont, atomic number 20Wadsworth/Thomson Learning, 2001). Chap 1-3Warry, John. Warfare in the Classical World An IllustratedEncyclopedia of Weapons, Warriors, and Warfare in the Ancient Civilisations of Greece and Rome. (Norman, OklahomaUniversity of Oklahoma Press, 1995). Chap 1-13