Arthur Miller’s †The Crucible Essay

In 1953 Arthur milling machine wrote a play authorize The Crucible, by writing this he aimed to ch aloneenge the assumptions of US society and take bulk to question each others responsibilities. In the 1950s senator Joe McCarthy started to exploit the US fears of communism and organised a witch hunt. moth miller would have seen this as similar to the Holocaust in the sense that passel were being falsely accused of being witches when they were not. Arthur was a Jew and so would have had sympathy with these people and this in my eyes was one of the key factors in the writing of this play. During the s casefuleenth century there was an outbreak in the belief of witchcraft in Europe.This led to mass immigration from Europe to America the immigrants were Puritans and so dictated up their own strict Christian communities. This is how Salem, Massachusetts came into being. Millers theatrical roles convey my point through their falsify of personality from run I through to Act IV. Th ere ar assorted types of change end-to-end the play such as change in character, beliefs and loyalty and these each occur at some point in the play to different characters. watch everywhere, a utmostmer, goes from a local, considerably respected musical composition to a man accused of being in contact with the Devil. Abigail transforms from sweet and beautiful to poisonous and evil. Hale on the other hand is bought into the play as a witchcraft expert, he ends up struggling with this particular geek and so changes into a frail, old and weak man. Putnam is much like Proctor and his story throughout the play is much the same and finally ends in death.The first time Putnam is mentioned he is said to be vindictive, subject matter he is sly and malicious. But there is a reason for this personality of his Miller does say that Thomas Putnam is a man with many grievances. This iterate alone says that his vindictive nature sum ups after a certain event in his life, this being that James Bailey (his son in law) had been turned smoothen as minister of Salem. But this changes completely as the bursting charges of witchcraft come out from the woodwork, instead of being scarred by this grievance he turns to his controlling self. During Act I the Putnam family cry witchcraft on a certain Rebecca reserve this is all Thomas Putnams alter ego. The Nurses were the ones who ultimately prevented James Bailey from taking office in Salem and for Putnam, blackening the Nurse name would surely open the gateway for Bailey to become minister of Salem.So, at the start of the play Putnam is portrayed as the accuser, and rightly so. But as we go on through the play we see Putnams character change somewhat rapidly from the accuser to the accused. This is proven correct when in Act III Danforth says, Mr Putnam, I have here an accusation by Mr Corey against you. This accusation alone figures how Putnams personality has changed from one extreme to the other he has gone from accuser to the accused. This outlook on Thomas Putnam goes someway to describing how the whole ordeal in Salem has changed everyone and is bigger now than ever before. This shocks the audience as it shows that this whole ordeal in Salem is changing even the around respectable of men.The next character we see is Reverend Hale he is brought in by Parris as a master of the supernatural arts, witchcraft. We are first introduced to Hale as, Mr Hale is nearing forty, a tight-skinned, eager-eyed intellectual. This makes the audience stand for straight away that Hale is a well respected and well educated individual who is very contempt with his job, to the extent he real enjoys it. Miller described Hale as someone who, felt the fleece.This shows Hale took pride in the fact he was sought after and good at his job, and a specialist in such areas. So, from how Miller describes Hale we see his willingness to be involved with this court and eager to show off his ability, as this improves hi s self esteem.. So it would be easy to attain that Hale would be a figurehead for the further Acts in the play, this is honest to some extent, until Act III where Hale ultimately loses his head he realises how much this case has affected Salem and its citizens, I denounce these proceedings, I quit this court.This quote itself lets the audience know how much the particular in Salem has blown up into something that never should have been. How it has all spurred from one accusation to a further ten, then at the end, over one hundred. It shows the audience how the situation has affected so many people and that Hale is the first to realise this. He, as a result, quits the court, this plentiful evidence to the statement that Hales personality has completely changed. At first he wants to be involved (the hero) and take pride in his work.But now, n Act III he gets as far away from the case as possible, it shows how the situation is changing people, and more so how it has changed Reveren d Hale. Hale is now portrayed as a weak, chapfallen individual, lacking in personality. He goes from strong to frail and deflated. The audience watch this would feel confused at seeing this radical change in this holy moral figure.Possibly the most important ambassador for change in The Crucible is John Proctor. We are first introduced to him during Act I, Miller describes John Proctor as, a farmer in his middle thirties. He need not have been a partisan of any camarilla in the town